DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

PMLA prevails over Bankruptcy Act: HC

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

New Delhi, April 14

Advertisement

The Delhi High Court has held that the money laundering law, PMLA, prevails over the Bankruptcy Act and insolvency code when it comes to attachment of properties obtained as “proceeds of crime”.

The court said the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act (RDBA), Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act (SARFAESI Act) and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) must co-exist and be enforced in harmony with the PMLA.

Advertisement

“... (these laws) or such other laws must co-exist, each to be construed and enforced in harmony, without one being in derogation of the other with regard to the assets respecting which there is material available to show the same to have been ‘derived or obtained’ as a result of ‘criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence’ and consequently being ‘proceeds of crime’, within the mischief of PMLA,” Justice R K Gauba said in a 105-page judgment.

The court passed the verdict on a batch of appeals by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against the orders of PMLA appellate tribunal on the pleas of various banks.

Advertisement

The ED, through Central Government standing counsel Amit Mahajan, had challenged the tribunal’s orders on the issue of third party rights over a property attached by the agency.

The tribunal had held that third parties, banks in this case, which have legitimately created rights such as a charge, lien or other encumbrances, had a superior claim over such properties.

The high court set aside the appellate tribunal’s order and held that the objective of PMLA being distinct from the purpose of RDBA, SARFAESI Act and IBC, the latter three legislations do not prevail over the former.

It remanded the matters to the appellate tribunal for further consideration. “An order of attachment under PMLA is not illegal only because a secured creditor has a prior secured interest (charge) in the property, within the meaning of the expressions used in RDBA and SARFAESI Act. — PTI

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts