DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Red Fort attack case: SC to rehear convict Mohd Arif''s plea

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today allowed the plea of Mohammad Arif the lone death row convict in the 2000 Red Fort attack case for a fresh hearing of his dismissed review petition in the open court
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Mohammad Arif, the lone death row convict in the 2000 Red Fort attack case, being escorted by policemen. — AFP file photo
Advertisement

New Delhi, January 19

Advertisement

The Supreme Court today allowed the plea of Mohammad Arif, the lone death row convict in the 2000 Red Fort attack case, for a fresh hearing of his dismissed review petition in the open court.

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice TS Thakur modified the apex court's September 2, 2014, verdict by which the benefit of open court hearing in the review petition was available to those convicts whose review petitions were pending and also whose executions were not given effect.

Advertisement

In his plea, Arif had submitted that his case fell in a solitary category as both his review petition and curative petition were dismissed before the apex court came out with the crucial verdict giving benefit to death row convicts that there review plea can be heard in open court by a three-judge bench.

Before the September 2014 verdict, the review and curative petitions of death row convicts were not heard in open courts but were decided in chamber proceedings by circulation.

Advertisement

Arif's review petition was dismissed on September 2, 2014.

The apex court on April 28, 2014 had stayed Arif's execution in the case. Three people, including two Army jawans, were killed in the December 22, 2000 Red Fort attack.

On August 10, 2011, the Supreme Court had upheld Arif's death sentence and dismissed his appeal challenging the capital punishment awarded to him by a sessions court, which was affirmed by the Delhi High Court. — PTI

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Classifieds tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper