The Allahabad HC has dismissed Patanjali Ayurved Limited’s petition challenging Rs 273.50-crore GST penalty.
A division Bench rejected Patanjali’s argument that such penalties constitute criminal liability and can be imposed only after a criminal trial.
The Bench was of the view that tax authorities can impose penalties under Section 122 of the GST Act through civil proceedings without requiring criminal court trials.
The firm came under probe following intel about suspicious transactions involving firms with high Input Tax Credit (ITC) utilisation but no income tax credentials.
Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium
Take your experience further with Premium access.
Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Already a Member? Sign In Now