TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

GST fraud: Punjab scrap dealer denied pre-arrest bail

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement
Advertisement

Chandigarh, April 13

Advertisement

Additional Sessions Judge Jaibir Singh has dismissed the anticipatory bail application of a scrap dealer of Amloh, District Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab, in an alleged multi-crore GST scam unearthed by the UT Excise and Taxation Department in 2019.

Ganga Ram, the suspect, had moved an application after the police issued summons to join an investigation in the alleged scam.

As per the prosecution, on a complaint of Deepa Chaudhary, Excise and Taxation Officer, Chandigarh, a case in the alleged scam was registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the IPC at the Sector 17 police station.

Advertisement

The complainant had alleged that one Abhishek Modgil obtained GST registration under the UTGST Act, 2017, and the firm was not working at the declared place of business. Thereafter, he made transactions of taxable supplies of goods to the tune of over Rs. 20 crore and was liable to deposit the due tax in the government treasury. The accused committed fraud with the government department to the tune of over Rs. 4 crore by intentionally generating bogus invoices of sales and receiving bogus invoices of purchases.

The counsel for the applicant said there was nothing on record to prove the involvement of the accused in any manner. The entire case of prosecution was based on documentary evidence and hence, custodial interrogation of the applicant was not necessary.

Opposing the bail plea, Hukum Singh, Public Prosecutor, stated that the custodial interrogation of the accused was required to ascertain the facts.

After hearing of the arguments the court dismissed his bail application.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement