DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Lawrence Bishnoi’s in-custody interview: Punjab and Haryana High Court puts Rajasthan Government on notice 

Bench also asked Rajasthan Advocate-General to appear before the court via video conferencing on September 5
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Lawrence Bishnoi. File photo
Advertisement

Chandigarh, August 21

Advertisement

Nearly nine months after “known criminal” Lawrence Bishnoi’s in-custody interview “glorifying crime and criminals” was described as a matter of grave concern, the Punjab and Haryana High Court today put the State of Rajasthan on notice.

The Bench of Justice Anupinder Singh Grewal and Justice Lapita Banerji also asked Rajasthan Advocate-General to appear before the court via video conferencing on September 5. The State through its Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home Affairs and Justice, was also impleaded as a respondent to the petition.

Advertisement

The notice came after advocate and amicus curie Tanu Bedi submitted that the second interview, according to the SIT report, was conducted in Jaipur central jail. The Bench in December last had directed the registration of two FIRs to be probed by the SIT while observing that the interviewee was involved in 71 cases in Punjab and convicted in four matters, including offences under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 302 of the IPC and extortions. He was justifying target killings and his criminal activities, while reiterating and justifying threat to a film actor. The trials were under way in a large number of cases and attempt to project his persona as larger than life could influence the witnesses.

“Punjab is a border State and any deterioration in law and order or increase in crime could affect the national security as at times, anti-national elements take advantage of the situation and often use criminals for their nefarious designs. They often get help from across the border. There is a thin line between extortion, target killings and anti–national activities. The conduct of the interviews is an apparent jail security breach and violation of the Prisons Act. The interviews have been telecast for the last nine months and are available on public domain,” the Bench had added.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts