DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

NEET-PG: Plea in SC alleges conversion of Chandigarh UT quota to all India quota seats

In January this year, a Bench of Justice Hrishikesh Roy, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice SVN Bhatti held in the Tanvi Behl case that residence-based reservation in admission to PG medical courses within the state quota was constitutionally not permissible
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

A contempt petition has been filed in the Supreme Court alleging conversion of the Union Territory quota seats of Chandigarh to All India quota seats in violation of the top court’s judgment in Tanvi Behl’s case in which it was held that domicile-based reservation in PG Medical seats was impermissible.

Advertisement

"We can't do anything. It's only proper that being a contempt petition, it goes to the same judge,” a Bench led by Justice KV Viswanathan said on Tuesday, directing that the matter be placed before Chief Justice of India BR Gavai for its listing before a Bench comprising judges who passed the judgment in Tanvi Behl’s case.

In January this year, a Bench of Justice Hrishikesh Roy, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice SVN Bhatti held in the Tanvi Behl case that residence-based reservation in admission to PG medical courses within the state quota was constitutionally not permissible. It had said that only reservation to a limited extent was permissible for institutional preference alone and that state quota seats shall be filled up on the basis of merit in NEET exam.

Advertisement

Holding that it violated the right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution, the top court on January 29 declared domicile-based reservation for admissions to postgraduate medical courses within the state quota unconstitutional.

“The benefit of ‘reservation’ in educational institutions including medical colleges to those who reside in a particular state can be given to a certain degree only in MBBS courses, for which we have assigned reasons in the preceding paragraphs. But considering the importance of specialists doctors in PG Medical Course, reservation at the higher level on the basis of ‘residence’ would be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution,” the three-judge Bench said.

Advertisement

Having declared that residence-based reservation was impermissible in PG Medical courses, the top court said, “…the state quota seats, apart from a reasonable number of institution-based reservations, have to be filled strictly on the basis of merit in the All-India examination.”

The January 29 verdict had come on appeals against a Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment striking down residence-based reservation in PG medical courses in the Government Medical College, Chandigarh.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts