TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Two forgery accused denied pre-arrest bail

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Chandigarh, April 18

Advertisement

A local court has denied anticipatory bail to two persons booked for registering vehicles allegedly on the basis of forged documents.

Advertisement

As per an FIR registered last year, five vehicles were registered in the name of HILTI India Pvt Ltd, Industrial Area, Phase 2, Chandigarh, on October 25, 2018, while the company had already vacated the premises in April 2018. A board resolution was found attached with the applications for RCs of these vehicles.

The police alleged that the resolution had fake rubber stamps.

The counsel for the accused claimed that the applicants, Rajesh Yadav and Chandrish Sehgal, had been falsely implicated in the case. The applicants were not the beneficiaries and nothing was to be recovered from them.

Advertisement

On the other hand, the Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the anticipatory bail applications. He said the accused had presented a fake resolution. The bogus stamps, letter pad, etc, were to be recovered for which their custodial interrogation would be required.

After hearing of the arguments, the court dismissed their anticipatory bail applications. —

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement