DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
PREMIUM

BBMB’s foundation lacks federal and legal legitimacy

Remarkably, the BBMB allocates equal authority of decision-making to Haryana and Rajasthan, neither of which is riparian to these rivers.
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Norm: Under international law, riparian states retain primary rights to the water bodies. Tribune photo

THE Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB), established by the Government of India in 1976 under Section 79 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, has long stood as a critical administrative body overseeing the Beas and Sutlej rivers and their associated hydroelectric projects. Yet, despite its integral role in managing water distribution and power generation, the board’s legal foundation remains constitutionally fragile as the PRA was enacted under Article 3 of the Constitution, which deals with the formation of new states and alteration of boundaries and names of existing states. The BBMB’s existence, devoid of a dedicated parliamentary statute grounded in robust constitutional provisions as per Article 262 read with Entry 56 of List I, raises concerns about federalism, riparian rights and the rule of law within the complex water governance framework.

Unlock Premium Insights in This Article

Take your experience further with Premium access.

Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits

Combo
Yearly
Monthly
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts