DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Centre rejects New York Times report on Covid toll as ‘outrageous’

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

New Delhi, May 27

Advertisement

The government on Thursday rejected as “baseless and outrageous” a New York Times report that estimates Indian Covid toll at 42 lakh in a worst case scenario, 13.3 times the official toll of 3,15,235.

Late reporting possible

It is possible to have missed some deaths, but NYT projections are outrageous.-  VK Paul, Niti Aayog

The report cites experts to present three scenarios. In the best case, they estimate real infections at 15 times higher than reported, which means 40 crore cases. It assumes infection fatality rate at 0.15 per cent, throwing up 6 lakh deaths whereas official IFR is 0.05 per cent.

Advertisement

The second scenario assumes that actual cases are 20 times higher (53 crore) and an IFR of 0.30 per cent (16 lakh deaths). The worst scenario estimates actual infections at 26 times (70 crore) and an IFR of 0.6 per cent (42 lakh deaths).

VK Paul, member, health, Niti Aayog, said the question of mortality concealment did not arise. “The NYT report is based on assumptions. We have a strong mortality tracking system which has stood the test of time. Adjustments of late reporting can happen in a large country. It is possible to have missed some deaths, but NYT projections are outrageous,” he said. “It can be argued that actual infections were higher than detected. That can happen anywhere. But on what basis did NYT exaggerate India’s IFR from 0.05 per cent to 0.3 per cent (three times) and 0.6 per cent (12 times),” said Paul.

Advertisement

Top virologist Shahid Jameel, however, argued that Indian Covid deaths were not being counted properly. — TNS

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts