DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Court directs registration of FIR against journalist Rana Ayyub

A Delhi court has directed the police to register an FIR against journalist Rana Ayyub for allegedly making derogatory posts about Hindu deities and Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, which allegedly outraged the religious sentiments of Hindus. Chief Judicial Magistrate Himanshu Raman...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

A Delhi court has directed the police to register an FIR against journalist Rana Ayyub for allegedly making derogatory posts about Hindu deities and Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, which allegedly outraged the religious sentiments of Hindus.

Advertisement

Chief Judicial Magistrate Himanshu Raman Singh issued the order after lawyer Amita Sachdeva filed a complaint alleging that Ayyub’s tweets insulted Hindu beliefs and spread anti-India sentiments.

“In view of the facts and circumstances, the complaint discloses commission of cognisable offences for which an FIR is warranted. Present SHO Cyber Police Station, South, is directed to convert the contents of the complaint as FIR and investigate the matter fairly,” the court ordered.

Advertisement

The court stated that prima facie offences under Sections 153A (promoting enmity between groups), 295A (hurting religious sentiments), and 505 (statements causing public mischief) of the Indian Penal Code were made out, warranting a police investigation.

“The facts pleaded by the complainant are such which necessitate intervention of state machinery in the form of police investigation,” the court said.

Advertisement

Sachdeva initially approached the Cyber Cell of Delhi Police under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, claiming that Ayyub’s tweets were designed to “systematically mock and demean Hindu beliefs, insult India, and spread communal discord.”

The police, however, submitted an action taken report (ATR) stating that only a non-cognisable offence was made out since Section 66A of the IT Act was struck down by the Supreme Court in the landmark Shreya Singhal v. Union of India judgment.

Despite the ATR, the court found the allegations severe enough to justify an FIR. “Considering the gravity of the allegations, the court is of the view that it is expedient to order investigation in the present matter in exercise of the judicial power under Section 156(3) CrPC,” the court observed.

Sachdeva stated that she moved the magistrate’s court after the police failed to initiate an investigation.

The complaint highlighted that Ayyub’s posts revealed “an agenda to insult Hindu beliefs and spread communal discord,” necessitating state intervention.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts