Money-laundering case: Delhi High Court stays proceedings against Hero Motocorp's Pawan Munjal : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Money-laundering case: Delhi High Court stays proceedings against Hero Motocorp's Pawan Munjal

Issues notice to investigating agency on Munjal’s petition

Money-laundering case: Delhi High Court stays proceedings against Hero Motocorp's Pawan Munjal

Photo for representational purpose only. File



Tribune News Service

New Delhi, November 17

The Delhi High Court on Friday stayed the proceedings against Hero Motocorp chairman Pawan Kant Munjal in a money-laundering case probed by the Enforcement Directorate.

Issuing notice to the ED on Munjal’s petition, Justice Saurabh Banerjee posted the matter for further hearing on March 21.

A similar stay order was recently passed on the predicate offence under the Customs Act and the petitioner has been exonerated by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in that matter, the HC noted. “Accordingly, there shall be a stay of proceedings under the ECIR,” it added.

Justice Banerjee, however, clarified that the stay was in relation to the petitioner only and the ED was free to proceed further according to law.

The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) had filed a prosecution complaint last year on charges of allegedly “carrying, attempting to export and illicit export of prohibited items, that is, foreign currency” against Munjal, a third party service provider company called SEMPL and individuals identified as Amit Bali, Hemant Dahiya, K R Raman and some others.

DRI, an investigation arm of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), filed a charge sheet before a Delhi court under Section 135 of the Customs Act (evasion of duty or prohibitions) in the case.

Subsequently, ED registered the present case under various sections of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

Highlighting that the high court stayed the proceedings in the DRI matter on November 3, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the petitioner, on Friday argued that when the proceedings in the DRI case i.e the predicate offence has been stayed, the money laundering case cannot go on.

The ED counsel opposed the petition on the ground that it was not maintainable and was premature. He said money laundering was a separate offence, which can be probed even if there was a stay order in the predicate offence.

Recently, ED alleged that Munjal used foreign currency issued in the name of others for his personal expenditure abroad to “override” RBI rules and attached his assets worth Rs 24.95 crore as part of a money laundering investigation. —with PTI inputs

#Enforcement Directorate


Top News

Uttarakhand tunnel timeline: 17-day rescue efforts end in relief, jubilation

Uttarakhand tunnel timeline: 17-day rescue efforts end in relief, jubilation

41 workers were trapped in under-construction tunnel on Diwa...

‘Emotional moment’: PM Modi on Uttarakhand tunnel rescue operation

'Emotional moment': PM Modi on Uttarakhand tunnel rescue operation

Prime Minister salutes spirit of all the people associated w...

Supreme Court dismisses PIL seeking ban on Pakistani artistes in India; says don’t be narrow-minded

Supreme Court dismisses PIL seeking ban on Pakistani artistes in India; says don’t be narrow-minded

Petitioner contended that engaging Pakistani artistes would ...


Cities

View All