NGT seeks states’ response on tree protection framework

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has directed states and Union Territories to review and submit their responses within four weeks to the Central Pollution Control Board’s (CPCB) final report on strengthening tree protection and conservation frameworks.

The CPCB, in its final report dated May 21, recommended that states and Union Territories without a legal framework for tree protection should establish one, while those with existing laws should align them with the objectives of the National Forest Policy, 1988. The report emphasised the need for robust enforcement mechanisms, the use of modern technologies for monitoring, and adequate staffing and resources for effective implementation.

According to the report, “States and UTs not having a legal framework at present for promoting the growth of trees and enabling protection should take up the process of establishing the required legal framework.”

It further suggested that, “States/UTs with the existing legal framework may align with the broader objectives of national forest conservation efforts by integrating applicable advisories into their existing frameworks.”

The CPCB also advised that tree management in non-forest areas should be governed by clear guidelines, including authorization for felling, preservation of heritage trees, and preparation of plantation augmentation plans. It proposed that Tree Authorities should include representatives from government departments, urban planners, ecologists, arborists, legal experts, NGOs, and community members for “a holistic approach to tree management.”

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) has been asked to provide policy guidance, capacity-building support, and financial assistance under schemes such as the Green India Mission.

The Tribunal directed that all respondents must also submit their views on the conduct of a tree census, including proposed modalities for its implementation, particularly in major urban local bodies (ULBs).

The Bench noted that these measures were aimed at ensuring better coordination between central and state agencies and promoting effective monitoring of tree conservation across the country.