DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Shifting Yasin Malik’s terror trial from Jammu to Delhi: SC defers hearing to April 4

Noting that even 26/11 Mumbai terror attack case accused Ajmal Kasab was given fair trial in India, the Bench had on November 21 suggested setting up a court in jail to cross-examine Malik
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Kashmiri separatist leader Yasin Malik. PTI file
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Friday deferred to April 4 the hearing on CBI’s plea challenging a Jammu court order asking Kashmiri separatist leader Yasin Malik to appear in person to face trial in a case related to the murder of 4 Indian Air Force personnel in 1989.

Advertisement

A Bench led by Justice Abhay S Oka deferred the hearing after the CBI sought adjournment on the ground that Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was unavailable.

“All the accused have to be heard if the trial is to be transferred,” the Bench had said on January 19.

Advertisement

The CBI has challenged a Jammu court’s order for the physical production of Malik to face trial in the case. Currently lodged in Tihar Jail in Delhi, Malik insisted on being physically present in Jammu to cross-examine witnesses.

The Jammu Special Court has sought Malik’s appearance for cross-examination of witnesses in two cases -- the killing of four IAF personnel and abduction of Rubaiya Sayeed, daughter of late Mufti Muhammad Sayeed, a former Chief Minister of erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, in 1989.

Advertisement

The top court had issued notice on the CBI’s petition in April 2023 and stayed the Jammu court’s order.

Noting that even 26/11 Mumbai terror attack case accused Ajmal Kasab was given fair trial in India, the Bench had on November 21 suggested setting up a court in jail to cross-examine Malik.

Describing him as “just not another terrorist”, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had last month said, “We do not want to take him to Jammu and Kashmir because of the offence in which he has been convicted…The Government cannot go by the book in such cases.”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts