DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Supreme Court asks Delhi Police to respond on Tahir Hussain’s interim bail plea

Around 53 people had died and over 700 were injured in the communal violence that broke out in northeast Delhi on February 24, 2020, during the visit of the then US President Donald Trump
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Tahir Hussain. File photo
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Delhi Police to respond to former councillor and Delhi riots accused Tahir Hussain’s petition seeking interim bail to campaign in the ensuing Delhi Assembly poll.

A bench of Justice Pankaj Mithal and Ahsanuddin Amanullah asked the Delhi Police counsel to come prepared and argue the matter on Wednesday — the next hearing.

Senior advocate Siddharth Aggarwal, appearing for Hussain, submitted the former councillor was in custody for 4 years and 10 years months, and inciting a mob during the 2020 Delhi riots was the only allegation against him.

Advertisement

Around 53 people had died and over 700 were injured in the communal violence that broke out in northeast Delhi on February 24, 2020, during the visit of the then US President Donald Trump. The violence had erupted during the protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and National Register of Citizens (NRC).

Hussain – who was arrested in the case on March 16, 2020 — faces FIRs in 11 cases and has been granted bail in 9 cases, the court was told. The main accused have already been granted regular bail, Aggarwal submitted.

Advertisement

In its chargesheet, the prosecution cited 115 witnesses, of which only 22 have been examined.

“Suppose we feel persuaded that he makes out a case for regular bail, then why should not we should give at least interim?” the bench asked.

“If we are satisfied at this stage on merits that a case is made out, then why not (grant) interim (bail)? He is in jail for 4 years and 10 months. He is only an instigator and the very same allegation of instigation is in 9 cases, in which he has been granted bail. You can’t shut your eyes to that,” the bench said, posting it for hearing on January 22.

However, referring to the chargesheet, the bench said, “Your involvement is very much there. We have to consider it, time for interim bail is expiring,” said the bench, which had earlier commented that all such persons should be barred from contesting elections.

The Delhi High Court on January 14 granted custody parole to Hussain to file nomination papers from the Mustafabad constituency on an AIMIM ticket.

However, the high court had refused his plea for interim bail from January 14 to February 9 to fight the election, saying the gravity of allegations against Hussain, being the main perpetrator in the violence, resulting in the death of several persons, could not be overlooked.

About 11 FIRs were registered against him in connection with the riots and he was admittedly in custody in money laundering and UAPA cases, the high court had noted.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper