Three get rigorous life term in Ankit Saxena murder case : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Three get rigorous life term in Ankit Saxena murder case

Three get rigorous life term in Ankit Saxena murder case

Photo: X



PTI

New Delhi, March 7

A court here on Thursday awarded rigorous life imprisonment to three persons convicted of killing photographer Ankit Saxena in February 2018 over an interfaith love affair, saying death sentence in the case was not justified.

Interfaith love affair

Photographer Ankit Saxena was stabbed to death in broad daylight in the Khyala area of Delhi by the family members of a woman, with whom he had been in a relationship for three years. The woman’s family had opposed her relationship with Saxena as the two belonged to different communities.

Additional Sessions Judge Sunil Kumar Sharma was hearing the case against Akbar Ali and Shahnaz Begum, parents of Saxena’s girlfriend Shehzadi, and maternal uncle Mohammad Salim.

“After balancing the aggravating and mitigating circumstances, if the court comes to the conclusion that there is a possibility of rehabilitation of the convicts, a death sentence is not justified,” the judge said.

Special Public Prosecutors, senior advocate Rebecca Mammen John and Vishal Gosain, appeared for the Delhi Police. The court noted that when the crime was committed, Salim was 43 years old, while Ali and Begum were 40 years old. They have been in judicial custody for around six years, it added.

“They had clean antecedents having no previous involvement. Further, no history of any criminal inclination, drug abuse or any other addiction has been brought on record. Before being arrested in this case, the convicts were living with their families and were well-rooted in society,” the court said.

It said that along with the magnitude, manner and the purpose of the crime, the court had to consider other important factors, including antecedents, age, detention period and social background of all the convicts.

“Hence, considering the mitigating and aggravating circumstances, age, gender, social background, previous antecedents and the period of custody already undergone as well as their family responsibilities, this court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case for imposition of the death penalty,” the judge said.

The court sentenced the three convicts to rigorous life imprisonment for committing offences under Sections 302 (murder) and 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code. Imposing a fine of Rs 50,000 on each convict, the court directed that the fine amount be paid to Saxena’s mother.

Begum was additionally sentenced to three months of rigorous imprisonment and Rs 1,000 fine for voluntarily causing hurt, the court said.

The court observed that the death sentence could only be imposed in the “rarest of rare” cases. “The court is not justified in imposing extreme penalty even if it finds a particular case falling in the category of a rare case. The court has to see whether the case qualifies the category of an extreme form of rarity. In simple words, for imposing death punishment, a case must fall in the highest category of rareness,” it stated. On December 23 last year, the court convicted the three accused.


Top News

India’s economy to expand by around 7 per cent this year, country getting more investments than China: UN expert

India’s economy to expand by around 7 per cent this year, country getting more investments than China: UN

The mid-year update of the World Economic Situation and Pros...

Ghatkopar hoarding collapse accused brought to Mumbai, to be produced in court

Ghatkopar hoarding collapse accused brought to Mumbai, to be produced in court today

Was apprehended from Udaipur in Rajasthan on Thursday

Swati Maliwal ‘assault’: BJP Mahila Morcha protests near Arvind Kejriwal’s residence

Swati Maliwal ‘assault’: BJP Mahila Morcha protests near Arvind Kejriwal’s residence

The protesters, who were carrying bangles, demand Kejriwal's...

Acquisition of private property by State not valid if proper procedure not followed: Supreme Court

Acquisition of private property by state not valid if proper procedure not followed: Supreme Court

A Bench led by Justice PS Narasimha says any law on acquisit...


Cities

View All