Address trust deficit: SC has key role in protecting fundamental rights of citizens - The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Address trust deficit

SC has key role in protecting fundamental rights of citizens

Address trust deficit

FOLLOWING criticism from a section of the Bar, senior counsel Harish Salve recused as amicus curiae from the Covid-19 management case initiated suo motu by the Supreme Court last week. - File photo



FOLLOWING criticism from a section of the Bar, senior counsel Harish Salve recused as amicus curiae from the Covid-19 management case initiated suo motu by the Supreme Court last week. ‘It’s the most sensitive case this court will look into. I don't want this case to be decided under a shadow that I knew the CJI from school and college days... and allegations that there is a conflict of interest,’ Salve told the apex court. One can’t have any quarrel with the Supreme Court’s decision to accede to Salve’s recusal request. But what baffled many is the opposition to the top court stepping into Covid-19 management. Many senior members of the Bar, including Supreme Court Bar Association president Vikas Singh, wanted High Courts to be allowed to deal with the situation arising out of the pandemic as they were best suited for the purpose.

Noting that High Courts were exercising jurisdiction ‘in the best interest’, the top court pointed out their orders were creating confusion and diversion of resources. It said the orders passed by them ‘may have the effect of accelerating and prioritising the services to a certain set of people and slowing down the availability of these resources to certain other groups… local, regional or otherwise.’

During the migrant workers' crisis caused by the nationwide lockdown last year, the Supreme Court was criticised for its delayed intervention. In this background, its direction to the Centre to place before it a national plan with regard to the supply of oxygen and essential drugs, the method and manner of vaccination and the declaration of the lockdown is understandable. Also, it has clarified that it didn’t want the High Courts to stop dealing with issues arising in the states. It simply boils down to a trust deficit in the Supreme Court as an institution meant to protect the fundamental rights of citizens. Why is it that senior members of the Bar and civil society leaders prefer High Courts over the top court in times of crises? Given its vital role in preserving democracy in India, the Supreme Court needs to address this trust deficit.


Top News

Delhi Police register case in connection with doctored videos of Home Minister Amit Shah

Delhi Police register case in connection with doctored videos of Home Minister Amit Shah

The Special Cell has registered an FIR under various section...

3 kids among 8 killed as goods vehicle collides with truck in Chhattisgarh

8 killed as goods vehicle collides with truck in Chhattisgarh

The victims, natives of Patharra village, were returning aft...

Missing 'Taarak Mehta' actor Gurucharan Singh was to get married, faced ‘financial distress’

Missing 'Taarak Mehta' actor Gurucharan Singh was to get married, faced ‘financial distress’

Singh, who went missing on April 22, left for Delhi's domest...

Man kills friend over common love interest for a woman in Delhi's Mahindra Park

Man kills friend over common love interest in Delhi's Mahindra Park

Zahid and Ravi were known to a woman, who, too, was present ...

Karnataka BJP MP and former Union minister Sreenivasa Prasad dies at 76

Karnataka BJP MP and former Union minister Sreenivasa Prasad dies at 76

The 6-time MP from Chamarajanagar and 2-time MLA from Nanjan...


Cities

View All