Quasi-judicial bodies : The Tribune India

Quasi-judicial bodies

Inordinate delay in appointments defeating their purpose

Quasi-judicial bodies

While consumers have got multiple options, they have been rendered vulnerable to new forms of unfair and unethical trade and business practices such as misleading advertisements, tele-marketing etc. Photo for representation only.



The Supreme Court is unhappy with governments over the inordinate delay in appointments to consumer dispute redressal commissions. Despite its August 11 order to fill vacancies in all such commissions in eight weeks, the situation remains unchanged, forcing the apex court to suggest switching over to a new system of permanent consumer courts, unlike the commissions where appointments are for a fixed period. The court also vented its ire over a large number of vacancies in tribunals, saying that the Centre should abolish them if it isn’t keen on their continuation.

The Consumer Protection Act was originally enacted in 1986 to provide for better protection of the interests of consumers and for the purpose of making a provision for the establishment of consumer protection councils and other authorities for the settlement of consumer disputes. However, the disposal of consumer cases has not been fast due to various constraints. Also, the post-liberalisation Indian market has witnessed drastic changes in terms of products and services and the players offering them. The emergence of global supply chains, rise in international trade and rapid development of e-commerce have led to new delivery systems. While consumers have got multiple options, they have been rendered vulnerable to new forms of unfair and unethical trade and business practices such as misleading advertisements, tele-marketing etc. Parliament repealed and re-enact the Consumer Protection Act in 2019 to provide appropriate and swift interventions to protect consumers from such vulnerabilities. However, a large number of posts in consumer commissions remain vacant, rendering the law meaningless to a large extent.

Qualifications, selection criterion, method of recruitment, security of tenure, remuneration and conditions of service are key determinants of independent functioning of judicial/quasi-judicial bodies. A close look at the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, and the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, makes it clear that there is an attempt to assert executive dominance in appointments to the discomfort of the judiciary. While the judiciary and the government indulge in a slugfest over who controls appointments to tribunals and consumer commissions, the consumers continue to suffer. This unpleasant situation must end at the earliest.

Tribune Shorts


Top News

Defamation case: Rahul Gandhi likely to move court against conviction on Monday

Defamation case: Rahul Gandhi likely to move court against conviction on Monday

Gandhi was convicted on March 23 in the defamation case for ...

Bihar Police arrest 27 in Nalanda, 18 in Sasaram in connection with Ram Navami violence

Bihar Police arrest 27 in Nalanda, 18 in Sasaram in connection with Ram Navami violence

Situation in Sasaram and Biharsharif normal, say police

Amit Shah’s visit to Sashastra Seema Bal’s Patna Frontier cancelled

Amit Shah's visit to Sashastra Seema Bal's Patna Frontier cancelled

Notably, Shah’s tour of Sasaram in Rohtas district has been ...

Indian cricket legend Salim Durani dies at 88 in Gujarat’s Jamnagar

Indian cricket legend Salim Durani dies at 88; tributes pour in

The Kabul-born Durani played 29 Tests for India

Identification of Indian migrant family found dead near Canada-US border pending: Officials

Identification of Indian migrant family found dead near Canada-US border pending: Officials

Bodies of eight persons were found on Friday in a marsh on t...


Cities

View All