DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

9 years on, HC revives hearing in suo motu case on Jat stir violence, calls for status report

The Bench headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu issued the direction after being informed that several issues raised earlier may have turned infructuous with the passage of time

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
The Bench headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu issued the direction after being informed that several issues raised earlier might have turned infructuous with the passage of time. Tribune file
Advertisement

Nearly a decade after taking suo motu cognizance of reports published in these columns on alleged lawlessness during the Jat agitation, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Monday virtually revived the matter by calling for a fresh status report on developments over the past six to seven years.

Advertisement

The Bench headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu issued the direction after being informed that several issues raised earlier might have turned infructuous with the passage of time.

Advertisement

As the matter came up for resumed hearing, amicus curiae and senior advocate Anupam Gupta told the Bench that high court had in August 2018 narrowed down the entire gamut of the case to four parts. “Due to the efflux of time, a lot many issues and disputes may have become infructuous”.

Advertisement

The issues framed by the court then the included monitoring of probe under senior IPS Amitabh Dhillon into cases of violence; to decide whether CBI probe was required into alleged rape in Murthal; monitoring investigation by the premier investigating agency into Moonak canal breach case; and to decide on government’s move to withdraw some cases against the agitators.

The Bench had then also directed senior advocate Gupta to submit a complete summary of the issues for better understanding of the matter.

Advertisement

Taking a note of the submissions, the Bench asked the State counsel to “file synopsis of the present status of the developments that have taken place during the last six-seven years with regard to the issues”. The synopsis was directed to be vetted by amicus Gupta before its submission.

The high court – among other things – had then taken cognizance of alleged sexual assault on women in the fields of Murthal by 30-odd goons during the reservation agitation.

The Bench during the course of hearing was then told that Munak canal was breached during the stir, affecting water supply to Delhi. It was also told that as many as 2015 cases were registered police in 21 districts across the State after extensive violence broke, but there was an attempt by the government to withdraw some of the matters.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts