TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

HC puts Haryana on notice in matrimonial case

Petitioner alleges political interference

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court today put Haryana on notice on a petition alleging “political interference” in a matrimonial case. Among other things, the petitioner-husband alleged that the conclusion of an inquiry was changed under pressure from the SP “at the behest of minister-respondent”.

Advertisement

Appearing on the behalf of the husband and other petitioners before Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya’s Bench, counsel Nikhil Ghai and Armaan Singh contended that an inquiry into the complaint made by the respondent-wife was not carried out in a fair and transparent manner.

Advertisement

The parties were called for mediation, and an inquiry into the allegations was conducted by the Investigating Officer. Initially, she reached the conclusion that the alleged offences, as per the allegations, were made out only against the brother-in-law and the husband.

“However, due to undue pressure from the Superintendent of Police at the behest of concerned minister-respondent (Anil Vij), the conclusions were changed, and the complainant’s father-in-law as well as mother-in-law, were also nominated as accused only to harass and humiliate them,” Ghai contended.

The Bench was also told that these facts were made out from the conversation between the Investigating Officer and a senior functionary placed on record in the form of CDs. Justice Dahiya issued notice of motion to the state and some other respondents, but not the minister. The case will come up on October 13.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Tags :
#MatrimonialCase#SPPressureAnilVijFamilyDisputeHaryanaHighCourtJusticeSystemLegalBattlePoliceInquiryPoliticalInterferencepunjabharyanahighcourt
Show comments
Advertisement