HC reserves verdict on Uchana MLA's plea
The Punjab and Haryana High Court today reserved its judgment on an application filed by Devender Attri, a BJP MLA from Uchana. He was seeking dismissal of the election petition filed against him by Congress candidate Bijendra Singh.
Bijendra had filed a petition against Attri, seeking recounting of votes and alleging corrupt practises against him. Later, Bijendra filed amended petition, dropping the allegations of corrupt practises.
Appearing on Attri’s behalf, senior advocate Satya Pal Jain and counsel Dheeraj Jain submitted that the amended election petition by Bijendra Singh had not been filed in accordance with law and was in violation of Section 81 of the RPA Act.
Jain submitted that the petition had not been presented personally by the petitioner but by his lawyer, which was not permissible in law. He said the petition supplied to the returned candidate was only a photocopy of the original, which was not signed or attested to be a true copy by the petitioner.
Senior advocate Abhimanyu Tiwari, appearing for Bijendra, submitted that the filing of amended petition would relate back to the date of original petition and that such an application of the returned candidate had already been dismissed. He further submitted that the copy of the petition supplied to the returned candidate was the true copy and the signatures of the petitioner and lawyers were visible on the copy supplied to the respondent. As such, the petition was not liable to be dismissed 'in limine' or at the threshold.
Justice Anoop Chitkara reserved orders after hearing both sides.
Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium
Take your experience further with Premium access.
Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Already a Member? Sign In Now