DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Insurance claims: Technical panel to look into mismatch of area under cotton

Deepender Deswal Hisar, December 14 The contentious issue of the insurance claims of about Rs 120 crore under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojna (PMFBY) for the cotton crop damage that occurred in 72 villages of the district in kharif...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

Deepender Deswal

Hisar, December 14

Advertisement

The contentious issue of the insurance claims of about Rs 120 crore under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojna (PMFBY) for the cotton crop damage that occurred in 72 villages of the district in kharif season last year will be settled by the Haryana State Technical Advisory Committee (HSTAC).

Sources said the insurance firm, Reliance General Insurance (RGI), raised an objection after a massive mismatch of the data of the area under cotton crop and crop area that had been insured under the PMFBY came to light.

Advertisement

The firm had released claims worth Rs 396 crore to farmers in the district, but withheld the claims of about 55,000 farmers.

An official said the Revenue Department had verified that these 72 villages had a total cotton crop of 16,554 hectare and confirmed the crop damage for various reasons. However, the firm claimed that the farmers of 72 villages had got cotton crop on 30,873 hectare insured under the PMFBY. After the mismatch of data of the Revenue Department and the insured area, the firm refused to release the payment of claims as it would have to release claims to additional 14,319 hectare, which did not even have cotton crop.

The sources said the administration had tasked revenue officials to settle the matter, but they could not. “It turned out to be a matter of multiple insurance for the same area of crop. For example, one acre of crop was insured by banks, which had given loan to the farmers for sowing the crop. But the land was leased out to another farmer by the landowner, and then the lessee farmer too got this crop insured under non-loanee farmers insurance cover. It might be an attempt to get double the insurance crop, or even by mistake,” they said.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper