DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

No SOPs for CCTV cameras in Haryana distilleries: Enquiry team

Bhartesh Singh Thakur Tribune News Service Chandigarh, August 7 Cong for probe by HC judge State Congress chief Kumari Selja and AICC communication incharge Randeep Surjewala on Friday demanded an inquiry by an HC judge into the liquor scam. Selja...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

Bhartesh Singh Thakur

Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, August 7

Advertisement

Cong for probe by HC judge

  • State Congress chief Kumari Selja and AICC communication incharge Randeep Surjewala on Friday demanded an inquiry by an HC judge into the liquor scam. Selja described the SET report as a cover-up operation. She said the status of SIT was changed to SET and a half-baked report was given on July 30. tns

    Advertisement

The Special Enquiry Team (SET) probing the liquor scam has said Haryana’s Excise and Taxation Department did not issue any standard operating procedures (SOPs) for operating CCTVs and storing footage in distilleries and wholesale licence premises.

It pointed out that Excise and Taxation Commissioner (ETC) Shekhar Vidyarthi did not ensure compliance of closure of vends during the lockdown. It has added that no instruction was issued for disposing of seized liquor.

The ETC told the SET that all distilleries, liquor factories and wholesale licence premises of L-1 and L-13 had CCTVs, but no SOPs regarding operation, monitoring and storage of feed had been issued. The SET said SOPs would have checked the illegal liquor supply.

Vidyarthi was questioned as to why he did not issue instructions in writing immediately after a decision was taken to close vends with effect from March 2.

The SET noted that directions to close vends were issued by Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioners (DETCs) and “it was only through newspapers that he came to know that permits and passes were generated on the system during the period of closure”.

Vidyarthi and the Excise Collector had no answer on the monitoring mechanism for storage of seized liquor, accounting for it and destroying it in the stipulated time. The SET said they could not cite any case of instruction to any DETC.

The SET found that the department had failed to ensure that penalties were levied on time under the Excise Act. Of the 8,337 cases, penalty of Rs 8.58 crore was imposed on 8,171 cases, but only Rs 7.21 crore recovered till June 1, “leaving a huge balance of Rs 1.37 crore”.

The SET found that the police in general were naming drivers of confiscated vehicles as accused, but in most cases, no serious effort seemed to have been made to address the origin of liquor.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts