TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Punjab and Haryana High Court issues notice in Om Prakash Chautala’s plea to quash defamation complaint

The complaint was filed by IPS officer Param Vir Rathee against 34 politicians and mediapersons
Haryana’s former chief minister Om Prakash Chautala. File photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Acting on a petition filed by Haryana’s former chief minister Om Prakash Chautala seeking the quashing of a criminal complaint filed by IPS officer Param Vir Rathee against no less than 34 politicians, mediapersons and others, the Punjab and Haryana High Court today issued notice of motion. Justice

Advertisement

Mahabir Singh Sindhu also fixed October 14 as the next date of hearing.

Advertisement

Chautala stated that he was ex-MLA, ex-chief minister and office bearer of the Indian National Lok Dal. Rathee, then posted as Additional Director-General of Police, moved a private complaint against 34 persons under Sections 499, 500, 501 of the IPC, alleging that the petitioner issued defamatory statement to the press against him.

“The respondent has implicated as many as 30 reporters/editors etc. from various newspapers as accused for publishing defamatory news against him. The respondent also implicated four politicians including the present petitioner,” his counsel added.

The bench was also told that the trial court, in violation of the provisions of the CrPC, passed the impugned summoning order. “The respondent has been withdrawing the complaints piecemeal qua various accused person,” he added.

Advertisement

Chautala prayed for quashing the impugned complaint and the consequential summoning order dated April 17, 2010, under Section 500 of the IPC passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurgaon.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement