DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Submit Pong wetland’s map within a month, NGT to wildlife officials

The principal bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT), Delhi, has granted a final one-month opportunity to the state wildlife authorities to file their reply and submit a detailed map of the Pong wetland’s notified wildlife sanctuary area and its...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Himachal - view - Migrated birds in pong lake (file photo)
Advertisement

The principal bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT), Delhi, has granted a final one-month opportunity to the state wildlife authorities to file their reply and submit a detailed map of the Pong wetland’s notified wildlife sanctuary area and its eco-sensitive zone in the lower Kangra region. The tribunal issued this directive while hearing a petition (648/2024) filed by environmentalist MR Sharma, who has raised concerns over alleged encroachments and illegal activities in the sanctuary. The next hearing is scheduled for February 18.

Advertisement

In his petition, Sharma has urged the authorities to safeguard the sanctuary, which is also an internationally recognised Ramsar site, from land encroachers. He highlighted that all illegal activities in the sanctuary were prohibited by the Supreme Court in February 2000. The petitioner expressed concern over the adverse impact of these activities on the biodiversity and ecological balance of the wetland.

The petition has named 14 respondents, including the Himachal Pradesh state government through the Chief Secretary, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, the Member Secretary of the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, and officials from the state Wildlife and Forest departments.

Advertisement

During an earlier hearing on September 17, 2024, the NGT had directed the respondents to submit their replies and a comprehensive map by January 8, 2025. However, the respondents failed to comply, prompting the tribunal to grant this final opportunity.

Environmental activist Sharma alleged that stubble burning within the sanctuary area after the harvesting season is endangering the safety of around one lakh migratory birds from about 100 species that visit the wetland annually. He also claimed that the sanctuary is being plundered and damaged under the very nose of the authorities concerned, posing a significant threat to its ecological integrity.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Classifieds tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper