DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Alleged misinformation on Maharashtra voters’ list: SC protects psephologist Sanjay Kumar from arrest

A Bench led by CJI BR Gavai passed the order after senior advocate Vivek Tankha submitted that the two FIRs were lodged against Kumar despite the deletion of social media posts
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Photo for representational purpose only. Reuters file
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Monday granted interim protection from arrest to psephologist Sanjay Kumar in connection with two FIRs lodged by the Election Commission, which accused him of spreading misinformation regarding Maharashtra’s electoral rolls through social media posts

Advertisement

A Bench led by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai passed the order after senior advocate Vivek Tankha submitted that the two FIRs were lodged against Kumar despite the deletion of the social media posts on "X" followed by a public apology.

“He deleted and apologised immediately. Even then two FIRs have been lodged,” Tankha said, urging the Bench to quash the FIRs and to protect him from any coercive action.

Advertisement

“Issue notice. In the meantime, there shall be no coercive action,” the CJI ordered.

He has been booked by the Sarakarvada Police Station in Nashik and Ramtek Police Station in Nagpur under various provisions of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for offences including obstructing public duty, misrepresentation, and misleading the public.

Advertisement

The psephologist made the Maharashtra government, the state DGP and others, including complainants Pravin Shekhar Tadvi and Mahesh Vinayak Kuldivar, as parties to his petition.

The complainants were working at the behest of the poll panel.

Kumar, co-director of Lokniti at the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), moved the top court over the two FIRs registered against him in Maharashtra accusing him of spreading misinformation related to Maharashtra’s electoral rolls through posts on X.

However, Kumar in his petition contended that the FIRs amounted to misuse of law and an attempt to harass an academic for what was, at worst, a bona fide error.

On August 17, Kumar wrote two posts in which he compared electoral rolls across certain constituencies in Maharashtra and related data -- subsequently being found misarranged due to a technical error by his associate -- suggesting discrepancies in voter lists.

He had reportedly claimed that the number of voters in Maharashtra's Nashik West and Hingna assembly segments rose by 47 per cent and 43 per cent, respectively, between the Lok Sabha election last year and Maharashtra elections this year.

He also claimed the number of voters sharply fell in Ramtek and Devlali constituencies by 38 per cent and 36 per cent respectively.

“I sincerely apologise for the tweets posted regarding Maharashtra elections. Error occurred while comparing data of 2024 LS and 2024 AS. The data in row was misread by our Data team. The tweet has since been removed. I had no intention of dispersing any form of misinformation,” he posted on X after deleting the controversial posts.

Kumar has also sought protection from any prospective FIRs over his social media posts on August 17, which reportedly contained incorrect statistical comparisons of voter lists.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts