DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Cash at judge’s house: Justice Yashwant Varma moves Supreme Court against in-house committee report

The invocation of in-house procedure against him was improper and invalid since it was done without any formal complaint, says Justice Varma
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad High Court has submitted that the committee’s proceedings violated principles of natural justice as the panel failed to notify him of its devised procedure and denied him opportunity to provide inputs on the evidence.
Advertisement

Justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad High Court has moved the Supreme Court challenging an in-house committee report that indicted him for recovery of unaccounted cash at his official residence in Delhi during a fire incident on March 14 when he was a judge of the Delhi High Court.

Advertisement

In its May 4 report, the committee comprising Punjab and Haryana High Court Chief Justice Sheel Nagu, Himachal Pradesh High Court Chief Justice G.S. Sandhawalia and Justice Anu Sivaraman of the Karnataka High Court indicted Justice Varma for recovery of a huge stash of cash in the storeroom of his official residence in New Delhi. The then CJI Sanjiv Justice Khanna on May 8 wrote to the President and the Prime Minister recommending Justice Varma’s removal.

Filed days before the July 21 commencement of the Monsoon Session of Parliament during which the Government is likely to move a motion to remove him from office, Justice Varma’s petition has urged the top court to declare that Justice Khanna’s recommendation for his removal was unconstitutional.

Advertisement

Justice Varma also challenged the in-house procedure on inquiry into complaints against judges, contending it created a parallel extra-constitutional mechanism that went against the law which exclusively vested the power for removal of high court judges in Parliament. The in-house procedure did not have the safeguards as provided under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, he submitted.

The invocation of in-house procedure against him was improper and invalid since it was done without any formal complaint, Justice Varma said, alleging that “unprecedented” public disclosure of the allegations by a press release issued by the top court subjected him to a media trial.

Advertisement

Justice Varma submitted that the committee’s proceedings violated principles of natural justice as the panel failed to notify him of its devised procedure and denied him opportunity to provide inputs on the evidence.

Accusing the panel of proceeding in a pre-determined fashion, Justice Varma said that even without finding any concrete evidence, it merely drew adverse inferences against him after reversing the burden of proof.

He contended that it was essential to determine who the money belonged to and how much was found. He alleged that CJI Khanna asked him to resign or seek voluntary retirement within an “unduly restricted timeline”, with a warning of initiating the process for his removal.

A fire broke out on March 14 at 11.35 pm at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma—who was then a Delhi High Court Judge—in a storeroom stocked with stationery and domestic articles and two fire tenders reached the spot at 11.43 pm and doused the fire in 15 minutes. It was alleged that unaccounted burnt cash was recovered from the site.

An initial probe report submitted by Delhi High Court Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya found substance in the allegations. The top court had made the report public and had also uploaded on its website the documents, including photos and video taken by the Delhi Police substantiating the allegations of the discovery of unaccounted currencies at Justice Varma’s residence. A video later surfaced showing bundles of cash burning in the fire.

The incident led to allegations of corruption against Justice Varma, who denied the accusations and alleged that it was a conspiracy to frame him. The CJI then initiated an in-house probe into the allegations and set up the three-member committee on March 22 to conduct the inquiry.

Following the allegations, Justice Varma was transferred back to his parent high court, i.e., the Allahabad High Court. However, judicial work has been temporarily taken away from him on instructions of the CJI.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts