DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Centre gets SC notice over plea to declare Ram Setu a national monument

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Subramanian Swamy. Reuters file
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Friday issued a notice to the Centre on former Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy’s PIL seeking a direction to “expeditiously” decide his representation to declare ‘Ram Setu’ a national monument.

Advertisement

Asking the Centre to respond to Swamy’s petition, a Bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta posted the matter for hearing after four weeks.

Ram Setu is a chain of limestone shoals between Pamban Island, which is also known as the Rameswaram Island, off the south-eastern coast of Tamil Nadu, and Mannar Island, off the north-western coast of Sri Lanka.

Advertisement

Swamy contended that he had already won the first round of the litigation, in which the Centre accepted the existence of Ram Setu. He said the minister concerned had called a meeting in 2017 to consider his demand but nothing happened.

He has demanded the Ram Setu to be declared a national monument in his PIL against the controversial Setusamudram Ship Channel Project, initiated by the UPA-I government.

Advertisement

The former MP has also demanded a survey by the Geological Survey of India and the Archaeological Survey of India in regards to Ram Setu as an ‘Ancient Monument of National Importance’.

In 2007, the top court stayed work for the project and later the Centre said it had considered the “socio-economic disadvantages” of the project and was willing to explore another route to the shipping channel project without damaging the Ram Setu.

The Setusamudram Shipping Channel Project has been facing protests from some political parties, environmentalists and certain Hindu religious groups. Under the project, a 83 km-long deep water channel was to be created, linking Mannar with Palk Strait, by extensive dredging and removal of limestone shoals.

The top court had earlier pulled up the government for dragging its feet in the matter. “Why are you dragging your feet,” it had asked the Centre’s counsel after he sought time to get instructions and file its response.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts