DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Courts not supposed to do moral policing: SC sets aside HC order against Tehseen Poonawalla

The Punjab and Haryana High Court had asked Vishal Dadlani and Poonawalla to pay Rs 10 lakh each to get the FIR against them quashed
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
A Bench of Justices Abhay S Okay and Ujjal Bhuyan quashed the 2019 order of the high court which had directed Poonawala and music composer and singer Vishal Dadlani to pay costs. Representative image/File
Advertisement

Observing that courts are not supposed to do moral policing, the Supreme Court on Tuesday set aside an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court imposing a fine of Rs 10 lakh on political analyst Tehseen Poonawalla for mocking Jain monk Tarun Sagar.

A Bench of Justices Abhay S Okay and Ujjal Bhuyan quashed the 2019 order of the high court which had directed Poonawala and music composer and singer Vishal Dadlani to pay costs.

The top court said the high court was swayed by the fact that the appellant criticised a priest belonging to a particular religion.

Advertisement

“What kind of order is this? There was no question of imposing cost. The court acquitted the appellants but imposed cost. Courts are not supposed to do moral policing,” the Bench said.

Poonawala had moved the top court against the high court judgement.

Advertisement

The high court had asked Dadlani and Poonawalla to pay Rs 10 lakh each to get the FIR against them quashed. The high court had also said that the fine was imposed to give a message so that no one mocked the heads of religious sects.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper