DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

EU, UK ‘carbon tax’, what it means for Indian industry

Vibha Sharma  Chandigarh, December 20 After the European Union, the UK has also decided to implement a carbon import levy/tax—Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)—on some products from 2027. The move aimed at protecting businesses against cheaper imports from countries “with...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

Vibha Sharma 

Advertisement

Chandigarh, December 20

After the European Union, the UK has also decided to implement a carbon import levy/tax—Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)—on some products from 2027. The move aimed at protecting businesses against cheaper imports from countries “with less strict climate policies” may subject $775 million of Indian exports or 6.8% of the exports to the country to 14-24% tax, as per reports quoting experts.

Advertisement

According to reports, the UK will finalise the details, including the precise list of products to be covered, after consultations next week. However, the decision has re-ignited tensions and arguments related to “historic wrongs by developed nations in escalating the climate conditions to its current state”.

The move is expected to impact businesses in other countries, including India.

Advertisement

As per economic think-tank Global Trade Research Initiative, India’s exports worth $775 million to the UK may be impacted due to carbon tax on products like iron and steel, aluminium, fertiliser and cement.

India’s exports are already under stress

According to a GTRI report in 2023, India’s merchandise exports declined by 5.3%, primarily due to diminishing presence in labour-intensive sectors such as textiles and leather and a weak global trade growth.

The CBAM will pose a significant challenge for India’s metal industry, experts say.

The EU’s carbon tax is expected to affect Indian metal exports worth over $8 billion annually, starting 2026.

Earlier, responding to the EU’s plans, commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal has already said that India will “retaliate” against such unfair taxes.

“Bharat will address the problem of CBAM with confidence. We will find solutions. We will see how we can convert CBAM to our advantage. Of course we will retaliate. India today does not do these things easily. Even with the US, we retaliated when they had put unfair taxes on us. And see what happened. We were able to resolve all the seven WTO disputes,” Goyal was quoted as saying.

CBAM and India

According to reports, the UK decision will apply to carbon-intensive products in the iron, steel, aluminium, fertiliser, hydrogen, ceramics, glass and cement sectors.

“This levy will make sure carbon intensive products from overseas – like steel and ceramics – face a comparable carbon price to those produced in the UK, so that our decarbonisation efforts translate into reductions in global emissions,” UK Finance Minister Jeremy Hunt was quoted as saying.

So far as India is concerned, sources say the government considers the tax “unfair” and is considering several measures, including taxing imports from these countries for their “historic wrongs”.

“Broadly the tax will be levied on import of products in manufacturing of which carbon emissions are emitted. However, the move will escalate the price of imported goods, making them less competitive. The fact is you cannot force the market to pay the price without any economic incentive for reducing emissions,” an industry representative said, seeking government policy support.

According to officials, India may be working on different measures like collecting and keeping the tax within the country and using it to decarbonise its own industry.

India may also be considering a tax on imports or goods coming from European countries. India is working on a carbon tax mechanism that aims to penalise imports from developed countries for their historic carbon emission that actually contributed to fuelling global warming at the cost of developing nations, they add.

CBAM criticism

Critics argue that if helping the environment and cooling down the globe is the ultimate goal, critics say fossil fuels contribute to 90% greenhouse and 75% of carbon emissions and these nations should actually tax fossil-fuel imports.

If the aim is to counter carbon leakage (companies moving production to countries with lesser environmental regulations to avoid paying carbon prices), that can be achieved by taxing imports from companies doing that instead of taxing all world imports, they add.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Classifieds tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper