DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

He’s still a judge, SC tells lawyer not using Justice before Varma

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
File
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Monday took strong exception to a lawyer referring to Justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad High Court as ‘Varma’, saying he’s still a high court judge.

Advertisement

“Is he your friend? He is still Justice Varma. How do you address him? Have some decorum. You are referring to a learned judge. He is still a judge of the court,” a Bench led by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai told advocate Mathews J Nedumpara.

The CJI’s comments came after Nedumpara sought listing of his petition seeking an FIR against Justice Varma in connection with alleged recovery of unaccounted half-burnt cash from his residence in Delhi. “I don't think that greatness can apply to him," Nedumpara responded.

Advertisement

As the lawyer insisted that the matter has to be listed for hearing, the CJI said, “Don't dictate to the court." "Do you want it to be dismissed right now?" the CJI asked and made it clear that it will be listed in due course.

On March 14 at 11.35 pm, a fire broke out at the Delhi residence of Justice Varma, who was then a Delhi High Court judge, in a storeroom stocked with stationery and domestic articles, leading to the alleged recovery of the unaccounted cash.

Advertisement

On May 4, an SC in-house committee consisting of Punjab & Haryana High Court Chief Justice Sheel Nagu, Himachal Pradesh High Court Chief Justice GS Sandhawalia and Justice Anu Sivaraman of the Karnataka High Court indicted Justice Varma for the recovery.

On May 8, the then CJI Sanjiv Khanna wrote to the President and the Prime Minister recommending Justice Varma's removal.

Last week, Justice Varma moved the Supreme Court challenging the in-house committee report and seeking to declare Justice Khanna’s recommendation for his removal as unconstitutional.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts