DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Karnataka HC reserves verdict on MUDA case probe by independent agency

The petitioners in the case, which involves CM Siddaramaiah, his wife, his brother-in-law and others as accused, had requested the court to refer the case to the CBI or another independent agency
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Photo for representational purpose only. iStock
Advertisement

The Karnataka High Court on Monday reserved its order on whether to transfer the MUDA case to an independent agency, such as the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

Advertisement

The petitioners in the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) site allotment case, which involves Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, his wife Parvathi B M, his brother-in-law Mallikarjuna Swamy, and others as accused, had requested the court to refer the case to the CBI or another independent agency.

The Lokayukta police have registered a case against the accused and have questioned them.

Advertisement

However, the petitioners, who are activists, are not satisfied saying that the police wing of the state's ombudsman cannot probe their superior, which is the Chief Minister, in a fair manner.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said, “The subject petition was preferred invoking the jurisdiction of this court under section 226 and 482 of the CrPC reference of the matter to the independent agency like that of the CBI or otherwise as the prayer is in the alternative.” The judge also quoted the orders passed by his court from time to time while hearing the petitions.

Advertisement

“In pursuant to the said order, the directions of the concerned court i.e. the session court was deferred up to January 28, 2025. Therefore, the filing of the report that was directed by the concerned court to the Lokayukta on or before was to be honoured before January 28.”

“In the light of the matter being heard at length, I deem it appropriate to extend the same till the pronouncement of the judgment. Judgment reserved,” the bench said.

In the MUDA site allotment case, it is alleged compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife in an upmarket area in Mysuru, which had higher property value as compared to the location of her land which had been "acquired" by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA).

MUDA had allotted plots to Parvathi under a 50:50 ratio scheme in lieu of 3.16 acres of her land, where it developed a residential layout.

Under the controversial scheme, MUDA allotted 50 per cent of developed land to the land losers in lieu of undeveloped land acquired from them for forming residential layouts.

It is alleged Parvathi had no legal title over this 3.16 acres of land at survey number 464 of Kasare village, Kasaba hobli of Mysuru taluk.

The Lokayukta as well as the ED are probing the matter simultaneously.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts