DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Kolhapuri chappals hit headlines as PIL in High Court questions ‘unauthorised use’ by Prada

Prada in its spring/summer collection showcased their 'toe-ring sandals' priced at Rs 1 lakh per pair
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Via instagram.com/prada/
Advertisement

India’s Kolhapuri chappals have hit headlines with a PIL in the Bombay High Court accusing Italian fashion house Prada of unauthorised use of the legendary handcrafted chappals.

Advertisement

The PIL filed by six Pune-based lawyers sought compensation to be paid to Indian artisans for allegedly copying their design—cultural symbol of Maharashtra. It has also sought a direction to Prada to refrain from commercialising and using its ‘toe-ring sandals’ without any authorisation.

It wanted Prada to issue a public apology for the misuse and acknowledge the use of Kolhapuri chappals.

Advertisement

In its spring/summer collection, Prada showcased their ‘toe-ring sandals’, which were deceptively similar to the Kolhapuri chappal, the petitioners alleged. These sandals are priced at Rs 1 lakh per pair.

Kolhapuri chappals (slippers) are already protected as a Geographical Indication (GI) under the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, the petitioners submitted.

Advertisement

“The court shall also order a permanent injunction against Prada’s unauthorised GI use and to compensate the artisans’ community for reputational and economic damages,” the PIL said, demanding a probe against Prada for violating the rights of GI-registered proprietors and the artisan community.

The PIL has sought damages and compensation to be paid to the artisan community, including a temporary injunction restraining Prada from marketing, selling or exporting their sandals.

Prada has privately accepted that its collection has been inspired by Indian artisans but has not yet issued any formal apology or compensation to the original artisans, the petitioners claimed.

”The private acknowledgement appears to be merely a superficial attempt to deflect criticism,” the PIL said and urged the HC to direct the authorities to ensure and protect the rights of the artisan community and grant them compensation. —with agency inputs

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts