DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Mere download of child porn an offence under POCSO and IT laws: SC

Says social media platforms can’t claim exemption
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Photo for representational purpose only.
Advertisement

Mere downloading, storage or watching of sexually explicit and abusive material involving children would amount to offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and the Information Technology laws, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday.

In a landmark judgment, a Bench of CJI DY Chandrachud and Justice JB Pardiwala said, “Child sexual exploitation is one of the most heinous crimes imaginable, and the offence of child pornography is equally heinous, if not more, as in the latter the victimisation and exploitation of the child does not end with the initial act of abuse.”

Replace term ‘child pornography’: Bench

Advertisement

  • Parliament must amend POCSO Act to substitute term “child pornography” with “child sexual exploitative and abuse material” to accurately reflect offences
  • Says child sexual exploitative material strips kids of their humanity and violates their fundamental rights

Writing the judgment for the Bench, Justice Pardiwala said Section 15 of the POCSO Act penalised the mere storage or possession of any pornographic material involving a child when it’s done with a specific intent prescribed under the provision without requiring any actual transmission, dissemination etc. “We are of the considered view, that wherever a person indulges in any activity such as viewing, distributing or displaying, etc., pertaining to any child pornographic material without actually possessing or storing it in any device or in any form or manner, such act would still (be) tantamount to ‘possession’ in terms of Section 15 of the POCSO, if he exercised an invariable degree of control over such material, applying the aforesaid doctrine of constructive possession,” Justice Pardiwala wrote.

It directed courts across India not to use the term “child pornography”, saying it failed to capture the full extent of the crime and could lead to a trivialisation of the crime, undermining the victimisation. “We…forbid the courts from using the term ‘child pornography’ and instead the term ‘child sexual exploitative and abuse material’ (CSEAM) should be used in judicial orders and judgments of all courts across the country which involved the actual abuse of a child,” the Bench said.

Advertisement

The top court said: “Parliament should seriously consider bringing about an amendment to the POCSO (Act) for the purpose of substituting the term “child pornography” with the CSEAM to reflect more accurately on the reality of such offences.

The Union of India, in the meantime, may consider bringing about the suggested amendment to the POCSO Act by way of an ordinance.” The verdict came on a petition filed by Just Right for Children Alliance and National Commission for Protection of Child Rights challenging the Madras High Court’s January 11, 2024, verdict that quashed criminal proceedings against a 28-year-old man charged with downloading pornographic content involving children on his mobile phone. Terming it “an egregious error”, the top court set aside the high court’s order.

The Bench said “social media intermediaries, in addition to reporting the commission or the likely apprehension of commission of any offence under the POCSO Act to the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), is also obligated to report the same to the authorities specified under Section 19 of POCSO Act i.e., the Special Juvenile Police Unit or the local police.”

It said, “In view of the salutary object and the mandatory character of the provisions of Section 19 and 20 of the POCSO Act read with Rule 11 of POCSO Rules, we are of the considered view, that an intermediary (social media platform) cannot claim exemption from the liability under Section 79 of the IT Act for any third-party information, data, or communication link made available or hosted by it unless due diligence is conducted by it and compliance is made of these provisions of the POCSO (Act).

Madras High Court order set aside

SC set aside Madras HC order that had said mere downloading & watching child pornography was not an offence under POCSO Act and IT Act

Stresses benefits of sex education

Says promoting a comprehensive understanding of the benefits of sex education is essential for reducing the incidence of sexual crimes in the country

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper