Review plea on Supreme Court verdict mandating 3-year practice for judicial services
Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium
Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Advertisement
A plea filed in the Supreme Court has sought the review of the apex court’s May 20 judgement, barring fresh law graduates from appearing in entry- level judicial services examination and fixed a three-year minimum law practice criteria.
The verdict of CJI BR Gavai and Justices Augustine George Masih and K Vinod Chandran on May 20 mandated a minimum of three years of legal practice as a prerequisite for candidates aspiring to become civil judges (junior division).
Advertisement
The review plea, filed by recently-enrolled advocate Chandra Sen Yadav, argues that it violated Fundamental Rights of the aspiring law graduates. The plea said the imposition of a uniform three-year practice requirement amounts to arbitrary and unjustified discrimination, depriving fresh law graduates of equal opportunity in public employment.
Advertisement
Advertisement