DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

SC junks Jacqueline’s plea in money laundering case

The Bench, however, gave liberty to the petitioner to approach the top court at an appropriate stage
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Jacqueline Fernandez. File photo
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to interfere with an order dismissing actor Jacqueline Fernandez’s plea to quash an Enforcement Directorate ECIR (equivalent to an FIR) in the Rs 200 crore money laundering case involving alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar.

Advertisement

“You withdraw this. Come at an appropriate stage. That would be the better option. We will not interfere at this stage,” a Bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Augustine George Masih told senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, who represented Fernandez.

The Bench, however, gave liberty to the petitioner to approach the top court at an appropriate stage.

Advertisement

Rohatgi told the Bench there was no allegation that Fernandez helped Chandrasekhar in laundering Rs 200 crore.

However, the Bench said, “The allegation is that it was given to you as a gift. Nothing has been proved. At the stage of framing of charges, you have to accept what the allegation is. We appreciate that the law is such that anyone can be involved. Take it as, they were two very close friends and now if one friend gives something to the other friend, ultimately if it is found that the other person is involved in a predicate offence…(it’s) very difficult…Vijay Madanlal (case verdict) has considered this part and we are bound by that.”

Advertisement

In July 2022, the Supreme Court had upheld PMLA provisions (Sections 5, 8(4), 15, 17 and 19 of the PMLA) relating to the ED’s power of arrest, attachment and search and seizure.

“I must know that this man is extorting, and want to send me part of the proceeds of extortion. With respect, otherwise I would be an accused in the main case,” Rohatgi submitted.

But the Bench said, “Dismissed with liberty to approach the court.”

Fernandez has challenged the high court’s July 3 order which dismissed her petition seeking quashing of the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) in the money laundering case. She is an accused in the money laundering case lodged against Chandrasekhar and had appeared before the ED for questioning in the investigation.

The Delhi Police had booked Chandrasekhar for allegedly duping the spouses of former promoters of Ranbaxy, Shivinder Singh and Malvinder Singh of Rs 200 crore.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts