DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Set timeline for anti-defection pleas, Supreme Court tells Maharashtra Speaker

Satya Prakash New Delhi, September 18 Disapproving of the inordinate delay on the part of Maharashtra Assembly Speaker in adjudicating on anti-defection petitions against Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and Shiv Sena MLAs supporting him, the Supreme Court on Monday asked...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

Satya Prakash

New Delhi, September 18

Advertisement

Disapproving of the inordinate delay on the part of Maharashtra Assembly Speaker in adjudicating on anti-defection petitions against Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and Shiv Sena MLAs supporting him, the Supreme Court on Monday asked him to come out with a timeline within a week for deciding the matter.

Seeks better self-regulation from TV channels

Refusing to get into rivalry between News Broadcasters and Digital Association and News Broadcaster Federation, a Bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud on Monday said it simply wanted to ‘tighten up’ the self-regulatory mechanism for TV news channels.

“What did the speaker do after the May 11 judgement by the court? It appears that nothing has happened… You can’t say that I’ll hear it in due course,” a three-judge Bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud told Solicitor General Tushar Mehta who represented Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar.

Advertisement

Move HC against ED summons, J’khand CM told

The SC refused to entertain Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren’s plea against the ED summons in a case of alleged money laundering. It, however, granted Soren the liberty to approach the Jharkhand High Court for relief in the matter.

As Mehta asked if the Speaker should submit the details of his day-to-today functioning to the court, the CJI said, “He’s a tribunal under the Tenth Schedule (of the Constitution). As a tribunal he is amenable to this court’s jurisdiction…the Speaker has to abide by the dignity of the Supreme Court. 11th May… months have passed and only notice has been issued.”

Delivering its verdict on various issues arising out of the 2022 Maharashtra political crisis, a five-judge Constitution Bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud had on May 11 directed the speaker to decide the disqualification petitions under the anti-defection law within a reasonable time.

“We expect deference and dignity to the directions issued by the Supreme Court,” the Bench said, posting Shiv Sena (UBT) faction’s petition seeking disqualification of Shinde and other Shiv Sena MLAs supporting him for hearing after two weeks.

Asking the Speaker to issue procedural directions within a week setting out a timeline to complete the proceedings, the Bench said the Solicitor General shall inform it about the timeline set for disposing of the disqualification petitions.

On behalf of Shiv Sena-UTB faction, senior counsel Kapil Sibal alleged that the Speaker was sitting on the disqualification petitions even as senior counsel NK Kaul and Mahesh Jethmalani accused the Uddhav group of failing to file the documents in time, leading to the delay.

The Supreme Court on July 14 issued notice to the office of the Maharashtra Assembly Speaker on Shiv Sena-UTB legislator Sunil Prabhu’s petition seeking expeditious disposal of its plea for disqualification of Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and other Sena MLAs, who form a new government with the BJP in June 2022.

Prabhu accused Speaker Rahul Narwekar of deliberately delaying the adjudication despite the May 11 Constitution Bench verdict asking him to take a call on the petitions within a reasonable period.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper