DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
PREMIUM

When Parliament should have spoken as one

A unanimous resolution should have been adopted by both Houses against Pak terror. It would have been a signal of India’s unity on terror.
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
rhetoric: The special parliamentary debate on Sindoor did not rise above party politics. Sandeep Joshi

Was it too much to hope that after all the political point-scoring on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor was done, a unanimous resolution would have been adopted by both Houses of Parliament against Pakistani terror? A resolution would have been a natural corollary to the sending out of the seven all-party delegations to show that India stood together after the Pahalgam attack and had endorsed the government's kinetic action.

Unlock Premium Insights in This Article

Take your experience further with Premium access.

Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits

Combo
Yearly
Monthly
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts