Centre wants Delhi-Centre power row to be referred to larger Supreme Court bench : The Tribune India

Centre wants Delhi-Centre power row to be referred to larger Supreme Court bench

The Delhi govt opposes the Centre's plea saying it will only create delay

Centre wants Delhi-Centre power row to be referred to larger Supreme Court bench

Photo for representation. iStock



PTI

New Delhi, December 5

The Centre on Monday told the Supreme Court that it had filed a fresh plea seeking reference to a larger bench a matter involving a Constitutional issue related to the control of services in the national capital.

The Delhi government, represented by senior advocate AM Singhvi, opposed the Centre's plea before a bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha, saying, "This will only create delay and such tactics cannot be allowed."

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, said at the outset, "There are no facts to be controverted. But I have filed an IA (interim application) stating that this matter (Delhi-Centre case) may have to be referred to a larger bench."

Singhvi opposed the submission, saying it amounted to seeking a review of the apex court order which had said the matter did not require reference to a larger bench and the only issue remaining between the parties was the dispute pertaining to control over services in Delhi.

"What action has to be taken on IA can be decided when the Constitution bench assembles to hear it," the CJI said, adding that it can be raised at the time of hearing.

The CJI also informed the lawyers that one of the judges of the five-judge Constitution bench, Justice Krishna Murari, was unwell, indicating that the proposed hearing on December 6 may get postponed.

On November 11, the top court had said it would step back from the "actual arena of political conflict" between the Delhi government and the Centre and only deal with the Constitutional issue related to the control of services in the national capital.

The observations had come when Singhvi wanted to bring to the notice of the bench an affidavit by Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia in which he alleged that there was "paralysis in administration" as no bureaucrat was responding to ministers' calls.

The Centre had vehemently opposed Sisodia's affidavit, saying it was filed when the case was already fixed for hearing.

A five-judge Constitution bench is scheduled to hear on December 6 the legal issue concerning the scope of the legislative and executive powers of the Centre and the AAP government in Delhi over the control of services in the national capital. 

Tribune Shorts


Top News

Shraddha Walkar was ‘living in constant fear of getting killed by Aaftab’: Delhi Police to court

Shraddha Walkar was living in fear of getting killed before Aaftab decided to get rid of her: Charge sheet

Gory details of crime emerge, Delhi court takes cognisance o...

Will give appropriate response to any aggression: Army Commander on LAC situation

Will give appropriate response to any aggression: Army Commander on LAC situation

Lt General Upendra Dwivedi said Northern Command is in a hig...

Govt extends cut-off date for completing MBBS internship to August 11

Govt extends cut-off date for completing MBBS internship to August 11

Earlier, on January 13, the cut-off date was extended from M...

‘Amethi showed you magic’, counters Smriti Irani after Rahul says Adani’s fortunes rose ‘by magic’

‘Amethi showed you magic’, counters Smriti Irani after Rahul says Adani’s fortunes rose ‘by magic’

Union minister hits back after Rahul Gandhi’s anti-Adani and...


Cities

View All