TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Dissenting note: 'No application of mind by RBI'

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

New Delhi, January 2

Advertisement

Justice BV Nagarathna, who was part of the five-judge Constitution Bench that rejected pleas challenging demonetisation by a 4:1 majority verdict, delivered a dissenting note as she found fault with the process.

Advertisement

There was no independent application of mind by the RBI in recommending the cancellation of entire Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes as proposed by the Central Government, she said, adding that “Parliament was a miniature of the country…. Parliament which is the centre of democracy cannot be left aloof in a matter of such critical importance.”

She noted that Parliament, which is the fulcrum in our democratic system of governance, must be taken into confidence because it was the representative of the people of the country. While declaring the action of demonetisation as “an exercise of power contrary to law and therefore unlawful”, Justice Nagarathna said, “The status quo ante cannot be restored at this point of time.”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement