Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

HC nod to marriage registration via videoconference

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Changing times

Advertisement

*The registration of marriage of spouses separated by distance has to be addressed keeping in view the changing times, the court said

Advertisement

*In the case at hand, the Bench was told the wife, a medical professional, had been put on Covid-19 emergency duty in the United States

Saurabh Malik

Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, March 18

Amid the Covid outbreak, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has permitted the registration of marriages through videoconferencing. A Division Bench has overruled a Single-Bench judgment that refused to permit the e-registration of marriage on the ground that the parties could not be exempted from being personally present before a marriage officer to sign the “marriage certificate book”.

The Bench of Justice Ritu Bahri and Justice Archana Puri referred to a number of judgments before observing that it was possible for a person living thousands of kilometres away or anywhere in India to simultaneously communicate with another party.

The Bench added that technology enabled affected parties to attest documents digitally and ensure digitally secure transmission through the Internet. The objective and philosophy underlying the Information Technology Act was based on these developments. Against this backdrop, the registration of marriage of spouses separated by distance had to be addressed keeping in view the changing times.

The matter was brought to the High Court’s notice after Ami Ranjan and his wife Misha Verma filed an appeal through senior counsel Navniti Prasad Singh and advocate Nitin Kant Setia. The Bench was told that the wife, a medical professional, had been put on Covid-19 emergency duty in the United States.

It was added that Gurugram Deputy Commissioner-cum-Marriage Officer, in response to the petitioners’ request, intimated that there was no provision for registration of a marriage under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, without the parties appearing in person.

The Bench asserted the husband was not seeking his wife’s complete exemption from appearance before the Registrar of Marriage. His prayer was that the wife should be allowed to appear through videoconferencing for marriage registration.

The Bench further observed the appellants solemnised the marriage in December 2019 according to the Hindu rites and the ceremonies were performed in the presence of their families in Gurugram. The presence of the wife could be secured through videoconferencing. The husband and three witnesses could appear physically before the Registrar of Marriages/Marriage Officer. The certificate of marriage could then be issued after verification of facts as contemplated under the Special Marriage Act. Once the marriage certificate was issued, it could be made a part of the public record by entering it in the marriage certificate book.

“The entire process can be done after seeking the presence of Misha Verma, wife of appellant Ami Ranjan, through videoconferencing. For all intents and purposes, this would be a valid marriage certificate”.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement