Inordinate delay in trial ground for bail under NDPS Act: Supreme Court : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Inordinate delay in trial ground for bail under NDPS Act: Supreme Court

The Bench laments overcrowding of jails and appalling living conditions of prisoners

Inordinate delay in trial ground for bail under NDPS Act: Supreme Court

Photo for representational purpose only. iStock



Tribune News Service

New Delhi, April 1

Notwithstanding stringent conditions provided under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, inordinate delay in trial can be a ground to grant bail to an accused, the Supreme Court has ruled.

Section 37 NDPS Act says the court can grant bail to an accused only when it’s satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he’s not guilty of such offence and that he’s unlikely to commit any offence while on bail.

However, a Bench of Justice S Ravindra Bhat and Justice Dipankar Dutta said, “Grant of bail on ground of undue delay in trial, cannot be said to be fettered by Section 37 of the Act, given the imperative of Section 436A (which requires the accused to be granted bail if the trial is not concluded within specified period) which is applicable to offences under the NDPS Act too.”

It granted bail to one Md Muslim, alias Hussain, who had been in jail for more than seven years after being arrested on the basis of a statement made by one of the four accused nabbed with 4 kg ganja in Delhi.

The Bench lamented overcrowding of jails and appalling living conditions of prisoners.

Maintaining that laws imposing stringent conditions for grant of bail may be necessary in public interest, it said if trials were not concluded in time, the injustice wrecked on the individual would be immeasurable.

The top court emphasised that a literal interpretation of the conditions prescribed under Section 37 that—the court should be satisfied that the accused is not guilty and would not commit any offence --, would effectively make grant of bail impossible.

While noting that the validity of Section 37 NDPS Act and similar other provisions—Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act 1967 and Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 has been upheld, the top court sought to highlight that such stringent provisions restricting judicial discretion in grant of bail were enacted on the basis that trials would be concluded swiftly.

About The Author

The Tribune News Service brings you the latest news, analysis and insights from the region, India and around the world. Follow the Tribune News Service for a wide-ranging coverage of events as they unfold, with perspective and clarity.


Top News

Delhi burns at 52.9°C

Delhi burns at 52.9°C

Highest ever in Capital | IMD doesn’t rule out sensor error

Setback for Kejri, SC refuses to list plea for bail extension

Setback for Arvind Kejriwal, Supreme Court refuses to list plea for bail extension

Delhi CM had sought more time for medical tests

A first: In one go, 11 ED officers made Jt Director

A first: In one go, 11 ED officers made Jt Director

Probe agency has over 30 such posts


Cities

View All