Inordinate delay in trial ground for bail under NDPS Act: Supreme Court : The Tribune India

Inordinate delay in trial ground for bail under NDPS Act: Supreme Court

The Bench laments overcrowding of jails and appalling living conditions of prisoners

Inordinate delay in trial ground for bail under NDPS Act: Supreme Court

Photo for representational purpose only. iStock



Tribune News Service

New Delhi, April 1

Notwithstanding stringent conditions provided under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, inordinate delay in trial can be a ground to grant bail to an accused, the Supreme Court has ruled.

Section 37 NDPS Act says the court can grant bail to an accused only when it’s satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he’s not guilty of such offence and that he’s unlikely to commit any offence while on bail.

However, a Bench of Justice S Ravindra Bhat and Justice Dipankar Dutta said, “Grant of bail on ground of undue delay in trial, cannot be said to be fettered by Section 37 of the Act, given the imperative of Section 436A (which requires the accused to be granted bail if the trial is not concluded within specified period) which is applicable to offences under the NDPS Act too.”

It granted bail to one Md Muslim, alias Hussain, who had been in jail for more than seven years after being arrested on the basis of a statement made by one of the four accused nabbed with 4 kg ganja in Delhi.

The Bench lamented overcrowding of jails and appalling living conditions of prisoners.

Maintaining that laws imposing stringent conditions for grant of bail may be necessary in public interest, it said if trials were not concluded in time, the injustice wrecked on the individual would be immeasurable.

The top court emphasised that a literal interpretation of the conditions prescribed under Section 37 that—the court should be satisfied that the accused is not guilty and would not commit any offence --, would effectively make grant of bail impossible.

While noting that the validity of Section 37 NDPS Act and similar other provisions—Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act 1967 and Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 has been upheld, the top court sought to highlight that such stringent provisions restricting judicial discretion in grant of bail were enacted on the basis that trials would be concluded swiftly.

Tribune Shorts


Top News

Wrestler Sakshi Malik ends protest, to resume railways duty, 2 days after meeting Amit Shah

Top wrestlers resume railways duty, Sakshi Malik says will continue protest against WFI chief Brij Bhushan

Asks not to spread fake news amid reports of her distancing ...

US putting ‘full weight’ behind India’s defence modernisation: Defence Secretary Austin

US putting 'full weight' behind India's defence modernisation: Defence Secretary Austin

‘US-India partnership is a cornerstone for a free and open I...

Women often denied autonomy over own body; nudity and obscenity are not always synonymous: Kerala High Court

Women often denied autonomy over own body; nudity and obscenity are not always synonymous: Kerala High Court

Rehana Fathima, a woman’s right activist, was facing charges...

Jailed gangster Mukhtar Ansari convicted in 32-year-old murder case

Jailed gangster-politician Mukhtar Ansari gets life term in 32-year-old murder case

On August 3, 1991, Congress leader and brother of former MLA...

3 killed, 4 injured in fresh violence in Manipur’s Imphal West district

3 killed, 4 injured in fresh violence in Manipur’s Imphal West district

Injured admitted to hospital in Imphal where their condition...


Cities

View All