DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Ramani called me predator without any basis: Akbar

New Delhi, January 4 Former Union Minister MJ Akbar on Monday told a court here that journalist Priya Ramani called him ‘media’s biggest sexual predator’ without any investigation or basis. Akbar made the submission through senior advocate Geeta Luthra during...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

New Delhi, January 4

Advertisement

Former Union Minister MJ Akbar on Monday told a court here that journalist Priya Ramani called him ‘media’s biggest sexual predator’ without any investigation or basis. Akbar made the submission through senior advocate Geeta Luthra during the final hearing in a criminal defamation complaint filed by him against Ramani for allegedly defaming him by accusing him of sexual misconduct 20 years back.

Ramani had made allegation of sexual misconduct against Akbar in the wake of #MeToo movement in 2018. Luthra referred to Ramani’s tweet which accued Akbar of being media’s biggest sexual predator.

Advertisement

“If we look at what has been said, a conclusion is drawn that this is a predator. On what basis? All these averments (in the article) are based without any investigation or basis,” she submitted before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Ravindra Kumar.

She further read Ramani’s “premature tweet” on Akbar’s resignation. “This had further tweets. In my (Akbar) cross examination I asked if this was not correct. He resigned later is wholly immaterial. This shows malafide, maliciousness. “This is trial outside the court. Due process is in a court of law. One cannot become law onto oneself. This (the tweet) was incorrect,” she said. The senior advocate further accused Ramani of not telling the truth before the court. “I asked did you issue any corrigendum. She said yes. I said show. She said I would show on the next date. This was not necessary. She knew she had not issued any corrigendum. “She says her defense is truth but she knows it is not the truth. Only in cross examination she says it was not the truth. It shows her credibility as a witness,” Luthra said. She further said, “Can people repeat something incorrect? Repeating of lies by 10 persons doesn’t become the truth. Being a journalist, she could have independently verified. This is how responsible journalism works.” “A blatantly false, incorrect statement was made to court and a blatantly false defense was taken,” she said. The court will further resume the hearing on January 7. — PTI

Advertisement

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Classifieds tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper