DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

SC: Worried that AGR dues will be wiped out in IBC process

New Delhi, August 20 The Supreme Court on Thursday said it was extremely worried that almost the entire AGR dues would be wiped out in the IBC process, and noted that spectrum trading was different from sale of spectrum in...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

New Delhi, August 20

Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Thursday said it was extremely worried that almost the entire AGR dues would be wiped out in the IBC process, and noted that spectrum trading was different from sale of spectrum in the IBC.

A bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra, S Abdul Nazeer and MR Shah conducted the hearing on adjusted gross revenue (AGR) and past dues of the insolvent companies on the fourth day in continuation.

Advertisement

Justice Mishra observed that almost the entire AGR dues would be wiped out in the IBC process, and after the sale of the spectrum, the new user would have extinguished any demand pending.

He also asked could AGR dues be eclipsed under the guise of insolvency proceedings under the IBC, adding that it’s like a person is not paying but riding the horse. “You must pay the price…until one pays, he cannot use it,” Justice Mishra said. The top court noted that it bothered the court that the AGR dues remain unpaid. Mishra said in case the dues were not paid, the spectrum must be surrendered. Senior counsel Ravi Kadam, representing the monitoring committee of Aircel, contended before the bench that board resolutions of Aircel had been placed on record.

Advertisement

Justice Mishra then asked who was using the spectrum which Aircel surrendered? To which, Kadam said that no one and there is no instance of spectrum with any operator by Aircel as it was surrendered to the Department of Telecommunication (DoT), which was accepted by it. Kadam informed the court that when spectrum was sold, one-shot payment or deferred payment was proposed, and all companies paid little by little, and this does not mean there are dues. Kadam insisted that there was no dispute on ownership and the contract stipulated that one had the right to transfer. The hearing on the matter will continue on Friday.–IANS

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts