TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Supreme Court: Prior expression of views no bar on panel appointments

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Advertisement

New Delhi, January 19

Advertisement

Amid controversy over recusal of BKU leader Bhupinder Singh Mann from the Supreme Court-appointed four-member committee to talk to farmers agitating against farm laws, Chief Justice of India SA Bobde on Tuesday said prior expression of views not a disqualification for someone being appointed panel member.

Merely because a person has expressed a view on the matter was not a disqualification to be a committee member, Bobde said while hearing a case against physical hearing in the Delhi High Court.

As the court talked about appointing Siddharth Luthra amicus curiae in the case, the senior advocate said he had endorsed a statement supporting virtual hearing.

Advertisement

“How is this disqualification? Just because a person has expressed his views on the matter is no ground for disqualification from the committee. Generally, there is peculiar lack of comprehension about the constitution of a committee. They are not judges,” the CJI said. “We are talking of a general misunderstanding. Committee members are not judges. They can change their views,” he said.

NGT panel report on Yamuna pollution sought

The SC on Tuesday asked for a report from a National Green Tribunal committee on improving the water quality of the Yamuna and the action taken on its recommendations. A Bench asked for the report after amicus curiae and senior advocate Meenakshi Arora said the NGT-appointed panel had been monitoring the cleaning of the river.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement