DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Supreme Court rejects NIA plea, orders Gautam Navlakha to be placed under 'house arrest' in 24 hours

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

Satya Prakash

Advertisement

New Delhi, November 18

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected the NIA’s plea against shifting Elgar Parishad-Maoist link case accused Gautam Navlakha from jail to ‘house arrest’ even as it ordered certain additional safeguards, including installation of more CCTV cameras.

Advertisement

A Bench led by Justice KM Joseph – which had on November 10 allowed Navlakha (70) to be placed under ‘house arrest’ on health grounds and later waived the requirement of a solvency certificate for him to be shifted from Navi Mumbai’s Taloja prison – said its order has to be implemented in 24 hours.

“The order of November 10 shall be given effect within 24 hours from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order,” said the Bench which also included Justice Hrishikesh Roy.

Advertisement

“Do not bring in conditions to say that with your entire police force you cannot keep a watch on an ailing 70 year old,” the Bench remarked.

The NIA had objected to the fact that the premises where Navlakha wanted to be kept during his ‘house arrest’ belonged to the Communist Party of India. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Additional Solicitor General SV Raju alleged that the accused deliberately suppressed material facts which amounted to abuse of process of law. They also alleged bias in the medical report on which the court’s order for Navlakha’s ouse arrest’ was based.

“Communist Party is a recognised party of India. What is the issue?” Justice Joseph asked Mehta who said, “If it does not shock you then what can I say?”

Making it clear that it did not shock the top court, the Bench went on to add certain additional safeguards suggested by the probe agency and said the order has to be implemented in 24 hours.

On behalf of Navlakha, senior counsel Nitya Ramakrishnan submitted that despite the top court’s November 10 order the accused has not been shifted to ‘house arrest’.

In its November 10 order, the top court had said, “The petitioner will not use a computer, internet or any other communication device while under house arrest. He will, however, be permitted to use a mobile phone without internet, provided by police personnel on duty, once a day for 10 minutes in the presence of the police.”

On Friday, the Bench reiterated that there shall be a strict bar on use of the internet and if there was any violation of the condition, the NIA can approach it again.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts