DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
PREMIUM

Justice HR Khanna, the lone sentinel of liberty during Emergency

In the landmark Additional District Magistrate (ADM), Jabalpur vs Shivkant Shukla case of 1976, the Supreme Court delivered a judgment that remains a black mark on India’s constitutional history.
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Justice HR Khanna’s stance underscores that the right to question authority lies at the heart of a constitutional democracy.

On June 25, 1975, democracy in India entered a dark tunnel. Indira Gandhi’s government declared a state of Emergency, suspending fundamental rights, detaining political opponents and gagging the press. Among the many institutional capitulations during this period, perhaps the most devastating came from the judiciary itself. In the landmark Additional District Magistrate (ADM), Jabalpur vs Shivkant Shukla case of 1976, the Supreme Court delivered a judgment that remains a black mark on India’s constitutional history. Yet, even in that moment of collective judicial failure, one judge chose courage over compliance — Justice Hans Raj Khanna.

Unlock Premium Insights in This Article

Take your experience further with Premium access.

Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits

Combo
Yearly
Monthly
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts