DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
PREMIUM

Why Chandigarh still eludes Punjab

Every change in Chandigarh’s governance brings Punjab back to the unresolved promise of 1966.

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Promise broken: As per the Rajiv Gandhi-Longowal Accord, Chandigarh was to go to Punjab. File photo

THE proposed Bill of the Central government to put Chandigarh under Article 240 of the Constitution so as to bring it on a par with the other union territories without legislatures has triggered condemnation from across the political class of the state. For Punjab-based political leaders, it is just not a move to reverse the change introduced in 1984 whereby the Punjab Governor was made the administrator of Chandigarh or merely a step to put the union territory under the Lieutenant Governor, as is the case elsewhere in the country. In Punjab, any move to alter Chandigarh's governance takes stakeholders back to the question as to why a city built as Punjab's capital has not been returned to it even decades after the 1966 reorganisation.

Unlock Premium Insights in This Article

Take your experience further with Premium access.

Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits

Combo
Yearly
Monthly
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts