DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Advertisement for reservation in Punjab AG office challenged

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement
Advertisement

Chandigarh, September 8

The Punjab and Haryana High Court today issued a notice of motion to the state of Punjab, the Union of India, and National Commission for Scheduled Castes, among others, on a petition for quashing an advertisement issued on August 20 for 58 vacancies “only for Scheduled Caste” in the Advocate General’s office.

Advertisement

The notice by Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu came on a petition filed by Ishan Kaushal against the state and other respondents.

Taking up the matter, Justice Sindhu also issued a “notice regarding interim relief”. Punjab Deputy Advocate General Lavanya Paul accepted the notice on the court’s asking. Additional Solicitor General of India Satya Pal Jain, assisted by senior standing counsel Dheeraj Jain and Gurmeet Kaur Gill also accepted the notice.

Advertisement

Appearing on the petitioner’s behalf, senior advocate Pawan Kumar Mutneja contended the reservation was contrary to the provision of the Punjab Law Officers Engagement Act, 2017, and also against the well-settled principle.

It was contended that a similar issue was raised before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Relying on the different aspect of the law and judgments of different High Courts, it was held that the engagement of a lawyer by the state and its instrumentalities was neither recruitment, nor appointment, into service or any post. It was engagement for a specified period for some specified cases to represent the state and its instrumentalities in the court. It could not, and should not attract provisions of reservation.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts