DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Faridkot court refuses to close evidence in 9-year-old ‘fake encounter’ case

Charges framed against six accused: Earlier, the court had framed murder and conspiracy charges against six accused, including Punjab Cricket Association president Amarjit
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Photo for representational purpose only. iStock
Advertisement

In a nine-year-old alleged fake encounter case of Kabaddi player Ajmer Singh, the Faridkot district court has refused to close the prosecution evidence even though complainants in the case have turned hostile.

Advertisement

Earlier this month, the court had framed murder and conspiracy charges against six accused — four Punjab Police personnel and two Bathinda-based liquor contractors — including Amarjit Singh Mehta, the current president of the Punjab Cricket Association (PCA).

The case dates back to May 2016, when Ajmer Singh, alias Jimmi, was killed during a late-night patrol by the Jaitu police. While the police claimed he was shot in self-defence after he opened fire on them, complainants alleged that the killing was stage-managed at the behest of liquor contractors Mehta and Dharampal Singh due to business rivalry.

Advertisement

Additional Sessions Judge Dinesh Kumar Wadhwa declined the public prosecutor’s request to close prosecution evidence after two prime witnesses, including complainant Manjit Kaur, turned hostile. The court observed that the key issue of whether the encounter was genuine or staged still needed to be examined in depth.

“The court cannot remain a mute spectator. It must actively ensure that justice is done,” the order stated, directing that several eyewitnesses, officials, and a judicial magistrate, who had earlier inquired into the case, be summoned for testimony.

Advertisement

The court was of the view that the prosecution evidence should not have been closed merely on the ground that Manjit Kaur and Sukhwinder Kaur, two of the witnesses did not support their versions given in the complaint. “Hence, prosecution is directed to examine the witnesses as mentioned in the list of witnesses by the complainant,” the court stated.

The next hearing is scheduled for September 12, 2025, when fresh witnesses will be examined.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts