TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

HC bins defamation suit against Tribune scribes

Punjab and Haryana High Court . File photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Just over four years after The Tribune’s then Editors Rajesh Ramachandran and Dr Swaraj Bir Singh, along with two reporters, were summoned in a defamation case by a Mansa court, the Punjab and Haryana High Court today quashed the criminal complaint filed in the matter with regard to them. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya has also quashed all consequential proceedings, including the summoning order, dated December 14, 2020, against them.

Advertisement

A complaint alleging defamation was filed by former MLA Nazar Singh Manshahia against AAP leader and now Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann. Justice Dahiya ruled that the complaint lacked any material to show that the journalists had reported Mann’s allegations with intent to harm the complainant’s reputation.

Advertisement

“As allegations in the complaint even if accepted in entirety do not constitute the offences under Sections 499 to 502 of the IPC (dealing with defamation), summoning the petitioners to face trial will be an abuse of the process of court, and a travesty of justice,” the Bench ruled. The court held that there was no occasion to summon them to face trial in the absence of any material indicating the petitioners’ complicity in the case. “The order is, accordingly, groundless and unsustainable,” the Bench asserted.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement